Free Conscience

Home

Answers to YOUR Questions

Current Info

decertification efforts

DecertFAQs

What You Should Know

What Can You Do?

State Employees

Taxpayers

Contact Us

Feedback for the WebMasters

Send A Letter To The Editor

Join Our Effort!

AlternativeOptionsPages

aop-1973

aop-didyouknow

aop-sniprule1

aop-sniprem1

aop-fullrule1

aop-sniprem2

aop-fullrule2

aop-wacsnip

aop-wacfull

links

The General Government Master Agreement

National Right to Work Legal Foundation

The Center for Union Facts

Non Association

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Governor & Legislative Contacts and Information

history

Who We Are

Charter & Mission

Editorials & More

Represented by WPEA, SEIU or Teamsters?

About This Site

WSFE & Union Info

Meet the Founder

Employees Wrongly Terminated

NTRW Law Suit

Public Employee Relations Commission (PERC)

FAQ's

FAQ

Decertification

decert efforts

Fun Stuff

Quotes

WFSE Speaks

About the Editor

Links & Information

 

WFSE Ploy for goodwill, or to make State look bad?

3/29/06 HOTLINE: WFSE/AFSCME asks state to reinstate employees fired for refusing to pay fair share fees

Posted On: Mar 29, 2006 (10:00:06)

This is the Federation Hotline for Wednesday, March 29. The Federation has sent the following news release to media outlets this morning:

March 29, 2006
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Union asks state to reinstate employees fired for refusing to pay fair share fees

The Washington Federation of State Employees has asked the state to reinstate all employees who had been terminated for refusing to pay dues or fees they owe under "fair share" union security provisions in the Federation's contracts that took effect in July 2005.

The union is also asking the state to make no further terminations at this time.

The union called for the reinstatement and moratorium on terminations while it corrects several technical mistakes in a notice sent in May 2005 to all 38,000 state employees covered by Federation contracts. It delivered the formal request Tuesday afternoon to the state Labor Relations Office.

The technical mistakes center on the union's notice of expenditures that explains which expenditures are germane to collective bargaining or representation activities and which are not.

For example, while the May 2005 notice correctly informed employees that the breakdown of expenditures had been verified by an independent auditor, the auditor's formal certification to that effect should have been included in the notice.

Because of the defects in that notice, the Federation will be sending out a corrected notice for the 2005-2006 fiscal year. This corrected notice will give fee payers a renewed opportunity to file objections. And that has prompted the union's request to reinstate terminated employees and make no further terminations pending distribution of the corrected notice.

"The technical errors in last year's notice in no way call into question the principle, embodied in state law governing state employees and in our contracts, that all bargaining unit employees covered by the contracts are expected to help pay the cost of union representation and collective bargaining, which benefits all employees, whether or not they are union members," said Greg Devereux, executive director of the Washington Federation of State Employees.

"The constitutionality of the agency fees and representation fees have been repeatedly upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and is not an issue here."

end WFSE hotline

To read a statement from the National Right to Work Education and Legal Defense Foundation, click here

Making Informed Decisions